Tuesday, November 24, 2020

How serious are you?




HOW SERIOUS ARE YOU?

by Jack Barnaby

April 1992

It is my observation that almost all articles about racquet games start with and proceed on the assumption that each reader wants and intends to be like the world champions who populate the tour rankings. I often wonder if this is a valid or justifiable assumption. Personally I don't think so, and moreover I think it is a good thing that it is not so.

 

In the first place, games are supposed to be played for fun, for diversion, for relaxation, or perhaps just to get some exercise. Second, to excel to any great degree requires a combination of physical and mental talents far in excess of what the good Lord chose to give to most of us. By “most of us” I mean 99 percent. Perhaps it would be nearer the truth to say 99.9 percent. That is one in a thousand. Question does one in a thousand tennis or squash players rank on the com puter list? I believe it is a good bit less than one in a thousand since millions play and only hundreds get ranked. But one in a thousand is a nice easy round figure, so let's take that. 


This means that for 999 of any thousand readers, the idea of being as good as the champs is not in the picture. These readers play for fun. They know they'll never be champions, but they also know they could be a good bit better than they are right now. They are not really serious about the game, yet it has seized their interest and they'd like to improve. Also, as I like often to point out, you have more fun if you are getting better. So let's revise that initial assumption to be, "I'd like to come a bit closer to realizing my intrinsic potential.” Every player has potential, and very few have developed or come close to realizing all of it. This is a realistic objective involving no delusions of grandeur. It is a legitimate attitude for any player to adopt. How does this affect what is written by so called "experts” like me? 


The effect is quite drastic! All of a sudden I am dealing not with a potential national champion but with a much more ordinary human being who has reasonably obvious limitations. Many women cannot hit hard enough to get the ball past you unless they play rather high. The champion hits hard and low and still gets depth. What does the expert advise? Many players do not have much "touch.” They have difficulty perfecting little short shots. The champion has natural feel and touch and quickly develops a varied arsenal of soft shots. What does the expert advise? And so it goes: what is good for the champion is often beyond the ability of the average club hacker. Then to all this we must add that the champion is usually quite independent. He doesn't bother much with articles by me or anyone else. He does his own thinking and makes his own plans. So the writer must realize that the most talented may not even read what is written, never mind be influenced by it. All this is not so good for the expert's vanity, but it is nonetheless true. 


So the writer should add some more assumptions to the initial one. He is writing for less, rather than more, accomplished players, since they are the only ones who may read what he says. He is writing for people whose potential is somewhat limited. Therefore he must be selective in what he advises. It is not enough for him to ask, “Is this (what the champ does) the best?" He must then ask, “Is this within the probable potential of my readers?" 


I would personally add one more assumption: my reader is probably a reasonably busy person. He is NOT going to organize his life around squash. He IS going to think about and spend time on a lot of things other than squash: spouse, children, job, etc. As a writer, what have I to say to THIS person? And, writers should remember, there are 999 of these for each champion. 


So when I read an article about technique that is long, involved and exhaustively covers every detail I often think, “This is very expert stuff, but will anybody read it?" Then when I read one of these articles about nutrition, how to eat before a match, how to maintain moisture levels during a match, how to eat after a match - I cannot argue the science of it because I am too ignorant, but I can confidently assert, "Few or nobody will pay any attention to all this." 


Now that hurts. As a writer I do not welcome the thought that even those who read what I write will in all probability ignore it. But these are the facts, staring me in the face; the world is as it is, and no complaining by me that "It ain't right” is going to make the slightest difference. So we come up against the old rule of survival: adapt or perish. What does this mean? It means I must try to give advice that is simple, short (not time consuming if followed), within the potential of everyone (female as well as male), and conducive to enhanced enjoyment (we play for fun). 


If you, the reader, are the one in a thousand, you probably will ignore what I write or go in search of these meticulous and more exhaustive treatises I mentioned above. If you are, as is more probable, one of the 999, then I hope and believe what I write is for you and is practical in its application to your personal situation. 


How serious are you about the game? Don't you have other things that come first? For years I coached at Harvard. We had many championship teams. But even there, advanced players put other things ahead of squash: their academic obligations, their plans for a career, their girl friends. I did not succeed as a coach because I motivated these people to discard other commitments and concentrate on squash. I got along because I recognized and adapted to the fact that my little squash world was not the whole universe and couldn't be made to be the whole thing. 


It's a matter of values, and I have always felt and still feel that most people should not be too serious about squash. If this be heresy, then make the most of it, as somebody or other once said. The Ivy League approach to extracurricular activities (by no means restricted to the Ivy schools) is based on careful thinking and important values. It is a position that can be defended better than any other I have encountered. So if you have felt at all guilty about not putting ALL your time on the game, forget it: your inclination to make other commitments is natural, healthy and wise. Don't let anyone talk you out of it. AND, if you read 'Squash Tips' dutifully each month, I'll guarantee to give you little SHORT drills and practice methods that will bring you that enhanced enjoyment we all want. 


So, I've stuck my neck out: don't let me down! The short drills will start next month, and they will be applicable to BOTH hard and soft ball (I write for everybody!). Have fun! 


******










Monday, November 23, 2020

Former member Lauren Xaba née Patrizio in the news

 

Lauren Patrizio

For some quick background on our guest in this episode, here’s a quick overview:

Lauren Patrizio Xaba is the Executive Director & Founder of SquashDrive, the Squash & Education Alliance program based out of Oakland, California. Lauren has been at the helm since 2009, leading the program to evolve & grow to increase their mission’s impact.


We cover a variety of topics from; what it’s like navigating their core student-programing during a pandemic, how Lauren positioned herself to start Squash Drive and where the program is looking to break new ground in the sport—literally.

After College, Lauren launched her career in Marketing working at companies like Comcast & JP Morgan Chase, before coming to a decision point on what to do next.  When these crossroads happen, like many others, Lauren reached back to her roots and decided to explore how squash could make an impact in people’s lives.

Today, Lauren and the SquashDrive Board of Directors are embracing innovative thinking to be the first SEA program to have outdoor courts! The outdoor concept started as “wouldn’t this be great to have” but during Covid times, the conversation gave new perspective to the need and urgency.

The growth of Outdoor squash has been a topic of discussion for many decades but only a handful of courts currently exist. There is a major growth opportunity in this area but we first need to connect the passion, people & resources for more projects to be successful.

Lauren has been on the West Coast for 15 years, but she is originally from Philadelphia and while attending University of Pennsylvania, she Captained the Squash Team.

It was a pleasure to have Lauren as a guest and we would love to hear from anyone who is looking to grow squash outdoors! We hope you enjoy the conversation!

This episode of Squash Radio sponsored by ProSportLED – the most advanced lighting technology for sports.

Music for Squash Radio by Bensound.

If you have an interesting story you think our audience needs to hear, feel free to reach out to us on social media or email squashradio@gmail.com. As always, thanks for listening

Update

Lauren Xaba joins US Squash

Friday, November 20, 2020

More about Counterattack

 

MORE ABOUT COUNTERATTACK

by Jack Barnaby 

July/August 1991

I've written articles about defense and how to counterattack. As defensive play becomes more expert it merges with and becomes almost a part of one's offense. I attack you and you don't just get my shot; you attack back so now I, in my turn, must scramble to get to the ball. Last month I talked about this and emphasized that both a defensive lob and a counterattacking shot depend on reversing what we usually are taught: get your racquet near the ball, as contrasted with getting the racquet back. This affects how you run. 

A track man uses his arms when he runs. He "pumps". In squash (and tennis) you do not pump, you run with your legs only, and your right arm prepares the racquet to play while the legs get you there. The upper body and arms merely stay balanced; they don't actually do anything until you play the ball. Many players don't realize this. They run like a track man, pumping with their arms. Usually this means that by the law of averages, the playing arm, holding the racquet, is way back fifty percent of the time when you get within reach of the ball. It thus requires a wild last minute forward swipe to get the strings on the ball. A sloppy shot or an error usually results. Haven't you heard that anguished cry, "Why do I miss it when I get there?” Because they got there but were not ready to play. Running like a track man is often the cause of this distressful result. 

In sharp contrast: if you run with your wrist cocked (so you can snap if you wish) but your arm out in front toward the ball (not back away from it) you will be much more poised, i.e. on balance, so you will execute well whatever you choose to do. Even more important, you will have options: you can tweak a drop shot, snip a quick corner shot, or snap the ball deep. You can even flip a lob (some times a good play). It is a wonderful feeling to know that you not only can get to your opponent's shot, but that you can actually exploit it as an opportunity. 

All that has been said in this article and in the preceding articles about defense and counterattack can be drilled. I recall a grueling lesson administered to me by Harry Cowles. First he hit a beautiful low reverse corner, out of his hand. He said, "Get it.” “I can't get that-it's too good.” “Yes you can. Get it.” So I crouched low, learned to start like a cork out of a champagne bottle and I got it. But that wasn't enough. "Drop it when you get there.” Now I had to get there not only with my racquet ready to play, but with my feet arranged properly also so I could crack it down the wall with speed and accuracy. Not easy. 

Running like a track man 
is often the cause of 
this distressful result. 

At the end of that lesson, I was totally exhausted, but I was inspired. Now, when I made a poor shot that came out, I actually hoped my opponent would make a corner shot. I figured, “If he corners, I won't just get it-I'll put it away.” Even when in a losing situation I was planning to turn the tables and win the point. No longer did I worry about getting there. That was taken for granted. The question was, what did I choose to do when I arrived? Naturally these new skills gave me a grand increase in inner confidence: I didn't care who you were. You're good, are you? O.K., I've got some tricks myself. Let's play! 

I was ready to take on the world. Of course, I didn't quite conquer the whole world, but I conquered a much larger proportion of it than I had before; I was a dangerous opponent. And the point to be made here is that a considerable part of my increase in skill was in the areas of defense and counterattack. They are areas of great importance and great potential in the development of a young, eager but green player. 

I can add two thoughts to this general picture. First, the game is more fun when you really scramble yet are thinking and planning under stress. It is also more fun to watch as attack and counterattack shift the advantage from one to the other. Second, women are not as fast as men, so it is true there are some shots they can't get. However, they can proceed on the assumption, “If your shot isn' perfect, I can get it, and I'll put it away if I get it.” Thus, women can do what men do most of the time even if not quite all the time. As a generalization, it can be said that right now most women are MUCH slower than their intrinsic potential. They ought to remedy this. They can do this if they recognize quickness and counterattack as an area that can be drilled and markedly improved by such isolated practice. 

Perhaps I should add that I was far from a super athlete. I was not one of these kids who could challenge, “Race you to the corner," and usually win. I remember when in high school, they tested us all on our speed in running a hundred yards. I also remember the guffaws and raspberries that greeted my best effort-sixteen seconds. Yet I became reasonably fast in a squash court so that I was known as pretty good at covering the court. So in my case, at least, it was definitely not talent. It follows that if a clod like me could LEARN to be quite quick, then so can everybody else, even if we do not get to be quite as phenomenal as Mark Talbott or Kenton Jernigan or Alicia McConnell or Diana Edge.




Monday, November 16, 2020

John Lau Retires from Club SF

 John Lau Retires from University Club 

of San Francisco

from US Squash

US Squash gathers to congratulate John Lau: (l-r) Former US Squash chair of the board Andre Naniche (1995-97), fellow Cal Bear Mark Jones, Lau and former US Squash chair of the board Alan Fox (1993-95)

Last month John retired as head squash professional at the University Club of San Francisco. He had been the pro at the club for thirty-two years.

More than 130 people came to the third floor of the University Club on June 24 to bid fond farewell to Lau and his family, including Lau’s wife Evy, their two daughters Emily and Rebecca and Lau’s brother Steve.

More than a dozen people spoke about Lau’s impact on their lives and the Pacific Coast squash community. They included Dick Crawford, Lau’s legendary coach at Cal Berkeley in the 1970s; Busani Xaba, Lau’s assistant pro and now successor at the club; Lauren Patrizio Xaba, the executive director of SquashDrive, the Bay Area’s urban squash program. The evening was organized by Craig McAllister, with help from Jack Bickel, Mike Townsend and others.

Lau was presented with a special recognition plaque from US Squash; poems about his earlier hairstyle; a scrapbook of memorable photographs and notes; a street sign that signaled the club was renaming the alley behind the club “Lau’s Lane;” and the dedication of court B in his name. Outside the John R. Lau Squash Doubles Court is a portrait of Lau commissioned by Mike Townsend.

A San Francisco native who is now sixty-four years-old, Lau recently recovered from a battle with acute myeloid leukemia after being diagnosed in July 2013. 

An avid bicyclist, Lau regularly has rode around Lake Tahoe, a seventy-two mile trip. 

In 1991 he won the 35+ hardball title at the National Singles at Yale: he was down 2-0 in the finals to a player he had lost 3-0 to in the finals the previous year and eventually won the match 18-17 in the fifth.  He defended his crown the following in Denver. In 1998 he captured the 40+ at the National Doubles, on the left wall partnering with many time singles and doubles champ, Gordon Anderson

As the pro at the University Club, Lau directed three Lapham Grants and many, many dozens of NorCal, California, and Pacific Coast Championships.

******

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

The Great Sharif Khan

 



The Great Sharif Khan Turns 75


An excerpt from 'The Sheriff of Squash: The Life and Times of Sharif Khan' by Rob Dinerman and Karen Khan

from Daily Squash Report 11/10/20

Monday, November 2, 2020